--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I would maintain that those who don't think TM is > > > > > > > > > effortless *are not doing it effortlessly*. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would maintain they are not familiar with real > > > effortless > > > > > > > > meditation and simply enjoying their easy meditation > > > method, > > > > > > > > that's all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Or perhaps you never learned TM. There are plenty of > > people > > > > > > > who > > > > > > > went through the TM course who never learned TM, > > apparently. > > > > > > > > > > > > Bingo. > > > > > > > > > > Ah, the elitism argument. If anyone has a > > > > > different understanding of what Maharishi > > > > > said than I do, that's their problem. They > > > > > just didn't learn properly like I did. :-) > > > > > > > > Which is even funnier when you consider > > > > that the two people claiming to "know" what > > > > Maharishi "really" teaches are not teachers > > > > and, as far as I know, have never either met > > > > him or even been in the same room with him. > > > > But they learned "properly" when those who > > > > have spent years around Maharishi didn't. > > > > Fascinating, eh? :-) > > > > > > Nobody, of course, is claiming here to "know what > > > MMY really teaches." That isn't what's involved. > > > > > > > Hint: they're just parroting dogma, when > > > > Maharishi himself occasionally admits that > > > > the dogma is bullshit. > > > > > > No, actually in this case we're talking about > > > our personal experience. > > > > > > However, when "what MMY really teaches" is being > > > discussed--i.e., the intellectual teaching--Barry > > > almost invariably gets it wrong. And I mean > > > *patently* wrong, factually wrong. So having > > > been a TM teacher or having been the same room with > > > MMY for years is no guarantee of accuracy. > > > > > > Barry's not the only one, of course; we've had loads > > > of 'em on alt.m.t. But he's a particularly egregious > > > example. > > > > Have you ever considered just setting up a 'bot > > to post "Barry is bad" to FFL periodically? It > > would save you a lot of repetitious effort. :-) > > No, I think I'll just continue to point out your > intellectual dishonesty on a case-by-case basis. > (Not every bit of it, of course; that would be a > full-time job.)
Whatever gets you off. Have you ever considered masturbation as an alternative? :-) ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
