--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip> > > I repeat my theorem. Real bhaktis just live their > > lifestyle, quietly. Fake or mood-maker bhaktis tend > > to feel that they need to defend it. <snip> > You claimed that I said or implied that bhakti should > not be defended and that its POV should be ignored. > I didn't. Just above I have presented a fairly > civilized, socially-acceptable method by which a > rational person could defend bhakti and present > its POV.
But you just got done saying, "Real bhaktis just live their lifestyle, quietly. Fake or mood-maker bhaktis tend to feel that they need to defend it." Now you're saying real bhaktis *can* defend it. Which is it? Is it OK with you for bhaktis to defend their path, or not? Does such a defense expose them as fakes or moodmakers, or not? ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
