--- In [email protected], "wayback71" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > On Mar 13, 2006, at 9:21 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
> > 
> > > An MUM staffer says that Bevan and lawyers are putting quite a 
bit  
> > > into the
> > > lawsuit against MUM brought by the parents of Levi Butler. The 
suit  
> > > draws a
> > > bigger line to include other TM organizations besides MUM; the 
two  
> > > families
> > > make claims against the techniques too. A lawyer who helps MUM 
with  
> > > legal
> > > issues said he feels we can handle the allegations about 
techniques  
> > > but the
> > > claim against MUM for the wrongful death will be more 
difficult.
> > 
> > 
> > One of the dangers of canned meditation "techniques" is that 
they  
> > don't allow for all the subtle nuances of a potentially 
infinite  
> > variety of students. All these people would have to do is 
subpoena  
> > (or whatever you call it) the checking procedures and show how 
there  
> > are a limited set of responses, IIRC, none of which ever tell 
you to  
> > 'stop meditating' or cut back if "x" happens (i'm sure someone 
will  
> > correct me if I'm wrong here). And actually they had this kid 
over- 
> > meditating as it was. I'll be amazed if they get out of this one.
> > 
> > Upside is, this would be a good time to modify and expand the  
> > checking procedures to include what they darn well know are the 
side- 
> > effects--and sometime dangerous side effects--of TM. But we all 
know  
> > it is extremely unlikely this will ever happen.
> 
> Changing checking notes wold not help - that would put checkers in 
the position of 
> evaluating a person's mental status, and open them up to all sorts 
of liability wouldn't it?  
> And checking notes and getting people to learn TM seem to be the 
very last things on 
> MMY's mind for the last several decades.
> 
> No one person is to blame for this tragedy.  For example, I 
imagine that the parents of 
> Sem wish, in retrospect, thatthey had never let him go far from 
home to go to college 
> when he had a history (didn't he?) of mental illness.   Obviously, 
the MUM folks did not 
> handle this serious situation properly - no training in this?  No 
understanindg of mental 
> illness or psychosis by those making decisions? a desire to keep 
this a low profile event, 
> so no authorities were called or real help sought for this young 
man with a brain disorder? 
> LIke most tragedies, a series of events, each one of which should 
not have happened, did 
> happen - one after the other - and lives were ruined.  I think 
most of us have difficulty 
> anticipating the Worst.



Sadly, experiencing "difficulty anticipating the Worst" is an 
entirely moot point.  Why?  Because the rules of the university were 
clear and unambiguous: that the slighest infraction must immediately 
be reported to the applicable authorities.  As I understand it, this 
did NOT happen.




>






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to