--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> 
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > A few things don't quite make sense: if Wysong felt he was 
> > > > in personal danger why did he go to another room and 
meditate 
> > > > (unless he thinks his Maharishi effect of one was sufficient 
> > > > protection or something)?
> > > 
> > > He essentially did the same thing Suzy Dillbeck did.
> > > When faced with a situation that they perceived as
> > > unpleasant, rather than handle it or deal with it
> > > head-on (which was, after all, their JOB), they ran 
> > > for what they perceived as shelter and left the 
> > > situation to "handle itself."  Wysong ran to the
> > > shelter of meditation, Dillbeck to the comfort of 
> > > Maharishi's image. 
> > > 
> > > It's a pretty strong indictment of the claim that 
> > > TM makes one more able to deal with 'stress' and
> > > function effectively in the real world. I can only 
> > > hope that the next time I fly the person in charge 
> > > of air traffic control does NOT practice TM. "Oh...
> > > two planes on a collision course...better meditate..."
> > >
> > 
> > Rather, I think it an indictment of people in an 
organisation/cult 
> > who superimpose the instructions and/or philosophy surrounding 
the 
> > mental technique they practise onto the field of activity, 
> something 
> > they shouldn't be doing.  Indeed, it goes against the 
instructions 
> > of the TM Program (i.e. Dillbeck and Wysong were "off the 
program").
> > 
> > It all goes back to what I keep repeating on this forum: do TM 
> twice 
> > a day and then go into the field of activity and act according 
to 
> > the dictates of common sense and your own traditions, NOT 
according 
> > to the dictates or what you perceive to be the dictates of a TM 
> > philosophy (because TM is NOT a philosophy).  To do so means you 
> are 
> > bastardizing what TM is.
> > 
> > The dictates of what a reasonable person would do in a similar 
> > situation and common sense is what should have guided the 
actions 
> > and decisions of both Dillbeck and Wysong, NOT some perceived 
laws 
> > of nature as laid down by MMY.
> > 
> > So I would still contend that a person practising TM will, 
> > certainly, be a more successful acting person...but that assumes 
he 
> > is using rationality and common sense in his life and NOT 
> > bastardizing the field of activity with rules and regulations 
that 
> > are meant to describe laws of nature in an academic setting.
> >
> 
> Or from theperspective of someone who can float or whatever. No-
one 
> has ever seen MMY float (well, there was a guy I knew whose TMing 
GF 
> says she saw MMY float once but even assuming this was real, 
unless 
> he's capable of it at any arbitrary moment, the ability to float 
> occassionally means next-to-nothing in this context).
>


MMY floating -- or anyone connected with the TMO floating -- is the 
only thing that can save the Movement at this point...





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to