--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff <no_reply@> > wrote: > <snip> > > > The poster I was responding to was suggesting there > > > *were* no such anomalies (just as you were earlier), > > > which is ludicrous on its face. > > > > You are clerarly not reading my posts judy, so its hard to intervene > > with your debate with some phantom posts. I never said there were no > > anomolies, I simply asked for data and analysis so could understand > > how "anomolous" and "unsual" were being defined. The press gets > > quite excited and report sensational stuff all the time, that upon > > analysis, is much ado about nothing. > > One more time: The press didn't make up the idea that > there were anomalies. The press reported that financial > institutions all over the world thought there were > anomalies significant enough to investigate. > > So drop the straw man about the press, please. And > stop pretending you haven't been expressing extreme > skepticism that there were any such anomalies. >
Judy: if the press is, as you say, a "straw man", then why do you continually refer your correspondents to newspaper articles on the subject? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
