On Apr 9, 2006, at 11:31 AM, anon_couscous_ff wrote:

> --- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Apr 9, 2006, at 4:59 AM, t3rinity wrote:
> >
> > > From what I know, and what I have seen
> > > in the Satsang movement, this is exactly what is being done  
> there: The
> > > truth of non-duality is being pointed out and explained in  
> terms of
> > > his own everyday experience, it is being discussed, and quite  
> often
> > > people are guided towards self-inquiry ('who am I'.)
> >
> >
> > Yes this is what is happening in some cases IMO. Pointing out.
> > However at the same time after some are "introduced" they go on
> > rather quickly to claim Buddhahood, Unity Consciousness (brahma-
> > chetana), Cosmic Consciousness (turiyatita) or in the case of TMO
> > people, they go on to claim what "Maharishi said". In every case  
> I am
> > aware of, none of these people would fit the definition of those
> > states or the experience. There's a strong element of grandiosity in
> > it all.
>
> In some posts there seems to be a jumping around between a describing
> a dualistic state, turiyatita, and the non-dual state, brahma-chetana,
> and/or equating them.  And even apparent references to and confusion
> about a turiya type experience being "non-dual". The words imply some
> embedded (non)-logic along the lines of "Consciousness is awake to
> itself, Consciousness is Brahman, therefore I am in Brahman
> Consciousness."

Very much so.

But expect to be attacked by some egos if you mention or point this out!

It was even suggested that I should be happy and delighted that  
people are claiming to be enlightened--and I couldn't help but think  
"did the person who said that have the understanding that I would  
feel that way if I felt that was the case? What did they think I  
would feel if it was not the case?"

In a real sense, if we keep any framework, which had a beginning in  
time, it is just 'lust of result'--attachment to the fruit of our  
practice. Addiction to the idea of enlightenment is still addiction.


>
> > It's interesting, I was reading some prophecies from the 8th century
> > regarding when non-dual teaching would start coming to the cities of
> > the west and they describe this very phenomenon and what will happen
> > very precisely. One of the comments is 'if it were so easy to reach
> > perfect Buddhahood, the ocean of samsara would already have been
> > drained long ago.'
> >
> > "Masters of old lashed out at those who claimed to be
> > enlightened yet refused to be tested, calling them
> > "earthworms living in the slime of self-validated
> > satori"."
> > -Philip Kapleau Roshi
> >
> > How many were tested by their teachers? would be my
> > question--but I already know the answer.
>
> And, it seems, those not tested self-proclaimed ones then go on to
> proclaim others as "Brahman" or whatever.

Oh yes. And they'll attack you for questioning or mentioning certain  
blind spots.

>
> And not particularly open to questioning about their statements, by
> "peers". That is another type of testing, albeit a lower level, with
> quesions such as -- is the experience parallel to that of others, are
> there logical inconsistencies being presented, and are claimed
> charactristics of a claimed state manifest in the claimer?

Yes, yes, yes!

>
> Questioners are at times cast as "snakes" or as being jealous of not
> having any experience, etc. It seems that if the experience is true,
> and the interpretation of it is strong, any and all questions would be
> welcome. Answering  questions can be a catalyst deeper understanding,
> to bring light to unexplored perspectives and nuances.

Yepper.


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to