--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Apr 9, 2006, at 3:25 PM, sparaig wrote: > > > " Now is the time that meditation researchers should agree on common > > physiological variables and measure them in their perspective > > meditating populations. The resulting physiological profiles could > > objectively classify meditation practices, serving as a brain-based > > matrix to discuss meditation practices and understand their effects > > on the mind, body and the environment." > > A very naive assumption, as different styles of meditation will > produce different markers and therefore different variables which are > important to the style of meditation in question. For example in some > styles of meditation which have much, much deeper reduction in > metabolic rate will have a decrease in skin resistance--the opposite > of what TM or relaxation response style meditations would show. > > What the TMO would really like, since many stopped taking their PR/ > research seriously a long time ago, is to piggyback on the coattails > of the new research. That way they could sell more 2500 mantras. Then > Fred will have done his gurus bidding and maybe will get a video > visit from the sterile room.
I thought remote darshan could be quite powerful. :) To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
