--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
> >
> >  
> > In a message dated 4/16/06 3:57:42 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
> > jstein@ writes:
> > 
> > Because  it would seem to me that if Iran does indeed
> > > > have such "nuclear  insurance," our best bet, and
> > > > Israel's, would be to see to it  that we don't give
> > > > them a reason to use it.
> > >  
> > > Give it up Judith, just let it go..
> > 
> > Still can't answer,  huh?
> > 
> > Do we need to give them a reason to use it? Isn't the  existence of
> > Israel reason enough?
> 
> It seems obvious to me that the reason Iran feels
> the need for "insurance" is to deter Israel and the
> U.S. from attacking *them*.  Or, absolute worst case,
> to do a preemptive strike.  That's what all the
> "annihilation" talk is about, to discourage us from
> messing with Iran.
> 
> But if Iran no longer had reason to believe we would
> attack them, they would no longer need a deterrent.
> 
> > So we hold off provoking them until they have  two pieces of 
> > insurance or three pieces or four  or.....
> 
> Why would they go to such trouble if they felt
> secure?
>

Well, to a certain extent, the mere existence of Israel makes Moslem countries 
feel 
insecure for many, many reasons.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to