--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 4/17/06 9:42:03 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Er, the agenda has been a regime change in Iraq followed by > democracy and > > hopefully a regime change from within in Iran. The Iranian people > don't like > > their government and really would like better relations with the > west. And > > hopefully with enough discontent internally they would change > their own regime. > > And you really believe nuking Iran is going to turn > the people *against* their government? > > that's doubtful. But it might be an only and last option.
It isn't an option if there's no chance of its working. > If it is the only way to shut their operation down and prevent > them from building their own then so be it. And then you've got your 40,000 maddened suicide bombers, or more, some of them with suitcase nukes, as you and others keep pointing out. > I take it you don't mind if they have their own nuclear arsenal, > do you? I mean everybody else has them, why shouldn't they? Is that where > you're coming from? That's too stupid to respond to. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
