--- In [email protected], anony_sleuth_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], t3rinity <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], anony_sleuth_ff <no_reply@>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > I don't know  about the categories you suggest, it seems maybe
a bit
> > > > too complicated,
> > >
> > > Too complicated to use? Four buttons are beyond your attention and
> > > skill level? :)
> >
> > Its not just the buttons, you first have to get the idea across, what
> > exactly they are evaluating. If you do it well, why not? ButI still
> > think you emphazise one overall category, and can still add the other
> > two categories.
>
> Any NEW interface seems complicated at first: a cell phone's options,
> a cable TV remote and on screen options, various web sites, women
> (jk), etc. But after a few times navigating such, it becomes second
> nature.

I agree. One could give it a shot. But I'm not Yahoo :-)





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to