--- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "markmeredith2002"
> > <markmeredith@> wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > You've also not responded to my post regarding the dozens of
> other
> > > criminal allegations -- drug trafficking, murder, murder
coverup,
> > > financial corruption, etc. -- made by your sources throughout
> the 90s
> > > (which seem to be the rush and drudge crowd) against the
> clintons, all
> > > of which were not only false, but absurd.  The rape charges
came
> from
> > > the same PR noise machine, which was well funded and organized.
> >
> > And let's not forget the Paula Jones lawsuit.  She was
> > put up to it, and funded, by the same machine, *with
> > the specific goal of setting a perjury trap for Clinton*.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The real story of the Paula Jones "trap", as you put it, Judy, is
> that the ONLY reason Clinton was trapped was because of a new law
> that had been passed a few years earlier that was draconian in its
> nature and was destined to ruin the lives of many men who would be
> brought up on civil suit sexual harrassment charges.
>
> And the one politician almost singularly responsible for this silly
> law?
>
> Bill Clinton.
>
> But, of course, Judy would be the first one on the lynch line if
> those accused were some poor slob who didn't have either the power
> or the money to defend himself.  But because it was Clinton she,
> like silly partisans like Gloria Steinem, reverse themselves 180
> degrees and fall all over themselves defending a Democrat.

Shemp, take your medication, please.



>
> > They hoped that during the process, he would be asked
> > about other sexual escapades and would lie about them.
> >
> > The Monica story might never have come out otherwise,
> > because they would never have been able to get Monica
> > herself to sue him.  And if the Monica case had never
> > been exposed, it's unlikely either Willey or Broaddrick
> > could have been convinced to make their accusations.
> >
> > Hillary was widely mocked for her "vast right-wing
> > conspiracy" charge, but it turns out it was damn close
> > to the truth.  The various right-wing conspiracies to
> > get Clinton weren't all coordinated, but the effort as
> > a whole was indeed vast.
> >
>






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




SPONSORED LINKS
Maharishi university of management Maharishi mahesh yogi Ramana maharshi


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to