--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: <snip> > > Right. But the issue I'm trying to get at is whether > > it makes sense to claim someone doesn't have the > > siddhis because they do not/cannot perform them on > > demand, e.g., to satisfy a skeptic. > > "Do no"t and "cannot" are two different issues according to MMY. MMY does not perform > sidhis on demand. Many people believe that he COULD if he wanted (keeping the door > open for him being enlightened by his own definition). In fact, he's indicated in public that > he could, if he wanted, so he's kept that door open himself.
However, there could be a good deal of semantic ambiguity here, in light of how MMY defines Unity consciousness. In other words: Does he have the ability to want to do siddhis on demand, independently of what nature "wants"? ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Home is just a click away. Make Yahoo! your home page now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/DHchtC/3FxNAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
