new.morning wrote:

>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  
>
>>new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote:
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
>>>><no_reply@> wrote:
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>A flat tax (some say 17% would do it) with no or few deductions,
>>>>>starting at incomes over $30-50,000, (even a negative income taxfor
>>>>>incomes below say $15,000) would eliminate all the inefficiencies,
>>>>>overheads and drags on society from excessive tax accountants, 
>>>>>searching for tax shelters and deductions, poor economic choices for
>>>>>tax reasons, etc. And would trigger greater economic growth -- which
>>>>>is the engine for productivity increases, and that being the driver
>>>>>for wage rate increases at all levels.
>>>>>
>>>>>Unless you are mistakenly saying "income" when you mean estate tax 
>>>>>and want to tax estates above 12 million. A fair proposal in my view
>>>>>-- particularly if there are 3-5 kids, 20 grand kids etc.
>>>>>But then again, few with estates above 12 million pay much estate 
>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>< tax -- its all in sheletered trusts.
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>I suggest a flat tax per above, with an estate tax kicking in at
>>>>>$10-20 million.
>>>>>
>>>>>Just watch the resident ultra-leftists -- poor wannabes but
>>>>>never-gonna-bees,  whine at this :)
>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>This leftist has absolutely no problem with the 
>>>>suggestion. I'd make the estate tax level much
>>>>lower, but other than that, a flat tax with no
>>>>deductions is the way to go.
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Ok, my final offer: :) a 17% flat estate tax above five million.  But
>>>you hafta also support my 15 points towards real democracy --
>>>yesterdays rant (IRV, etc.) Its a package deal :)
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>BTW, I do agree with some of your 15 points.  Probably more than you 
>>would imagine.  BTW, do you fancy yourself a Libertarian?  You read
>>    
>>
>that 
>  
>
>>way.
>>    
>>
>
>I don't fancy myself anything. I don't take some platform and adopt
>it. I think through each  issue and decide on the merits. My views
>certainly are not universally libertairan. Ask me about pollution.  
>
Your views come off as Libertarian.



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Check out the new improvements in Yahoo! Groups email.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/6pRQfA/fOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to