--- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No need for "get a clue" rudeness.
I've mentioned this at least half a dozen times, and you *still* haven't addressed it. > You don't define what is relevant to me. Oh, blow it out your I/O port. It's irrelevant with regard to the point of the research and with regard its use for marketing, as I've explained and you have avoided addressing. If you want to make a big deal of an irrelevant issue, fine, but you don't get to claim that I shouldn't point out that you're doing so. > It calls into question the whole claim of coherence during > flying when they use charts in a fraudulent manor. You might at least give me credit for having handed this point to you on a silver platter. It isn't a very *strong* point, but it's really all you've got. As I noted, there's no way you can prove that the EEG coherence that *could* have been measured was fraudulent. And you also didn't address this: > > You know, I was wrong. The difference between the > > two charts *is* important to those who believe the TMO > > has committed a terrible sin of deception. > > > > The one from the TM site--the one on the left--clearly > > shows coherence *ending* after liftoff. Perhaps *that* > > is the one that's being used now. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
