--- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Second, of course, "anti-TMer" is an entirely > legitimate label for those who, like Barry and Vaj > and Curtis, routinely attack the TMO, MMY, and TMers > (individually or as a group)." > > > Since I have been on this group I have heard far more criticism coming > from others, some of whom practice TM. Other than responding to > things others have put up I have not initiated any criticisms of TM. > This designation of "anti-Tmer" is a stupid label in a group where > most of the posters couldn't get into the dome. If you really cared > about the movement you would encourage them to correct stupid > misleading charts instead of defending their stupid misleading charts. > > But in my world none of that matters. No one is looking at TM charts. > For the rest of the world they are so far into the silly zone that > all our analysis is absurd. So the question becomes "If a fraudulent > claim is made in the woods and no one hears it..." ...then the fat lady must be singing (while clapping one hand).
To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
