On Jul 12, 2006, at 6:50 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:

What is YOUR explation for the "less-than-pleasant sdie 

effects of TM?"



A technique that was cobbled together from several 

other existing techniques and given to guinea pigs 

(us) to test. As opposed to a technique or techniques 

that have been taught the same way and the effects 

noted and documented for centuries.


Indeed. There are several prerequisites that are supposed to occur *before* mantra diksha. One is correct posture, the other is pranayama and correct breathing.

In this sense Panditiji Sri Sri Ravi Shankar has restored the purity of the tradition by placing pranayama and purification before mantra initiation. Maybe that's why he has so much more support of nature. ;-)))


Again, I'm not suggesting that you believe this, but

I tend to. My belief is based on seeing a fair number

of TMers who complained about "heavy unstressing" for

years learn a different style of meditation, one with

more tradition behind it, and have all of the things

they considered "unstressing" go away completely within

a couple of days, never to reappear.


Yes, I've noticed the same thing.

This while their

subjective experience both of transcendence during

meditation and benefits after meditation increased.


I'm not trying to argue with you here, BTW. I'm just

trying to explain where I'm coming from whenever the

issue of "unstressing" comes up. I rejected the 

"stress prevents enlightenment" theory a couple of

decades ago, so I really don't hold many of the

core assumptions that a person who believes the TM

explanation does.


This would probably be high on the list of TM Fundamentalist beliefs. 

__._,_.___

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





SPONSORED LINKS
Religion and spirituality Buddha shakyamuni Maharishi mahesh yogi


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




__,_._,___

Reply via email to