I apologize for not reading the earlier posts where you quoted 
extensively from Harris. You're right about him. He reflects my 
thinking as well.

Esentially, it comes down to this. Claims made require testing. 
MMY's claims with regard to "yogic flying" have been found seriously 
wanting and those desiring to believe those claims in the face of no 
supporting evidence are deluding themselves. The TMO is real good 
about advancing delusion.

Jyotish falls into that area as well. And while we're at it, let's 
test yagyas too! I think I know what the results will show.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes that was right out of Sam Harris' perspective!  He is one of my
> favorite thinkers.  I must add that I was a full believer in all
> things TM at one time so my critique of this kind of belief is 
also a
> critique of my own former beliefs. Taking on and then shedding the
> beliefs of TM was an important experience for me.  I am fascinated 
by
>  people with  more spiritual beliefs than I myself hold.  This 
Yahoo
> group seems especially tolerant of different views and the rights 
of
> people expressing them.  I agree with your point that blending 
crazy
> beliefs and explosives takes the whole discussion out of the
> theoretical and into the world of "holy shit! 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Dave" <bikemaster@> wrote:
> >
> > Very well said.
> > 
> > Have you read Sam Harris' book, "End of Faith," or something 
like 
> > that? He says pretty much the same thing.
> > 
> > And, normally, I don't care if people want to belief 
preposterous 
> > stuff, but lately with people strapping on bombs and blowing 
> > themselves up in coffee houses because they believe that 70 
virgins 
> > will greet them in paradise, it hits a lot closer to home.
> > 
> > And that's much worse than a bunch of lemmings who have the 
delusion 
> > that people can fly, but certainly cut from the same non-
critical 
> > thinking cloth.
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" 
> > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > >
> > > The fact that you are even discussing the impossibility of 
flying 
> > is
> > > the result of a very successful marketing campaign isn't it?  
> > Based on
> > > people hopping around, MMY asserted that people would soon 
fly.  
> > Now,
> > > so many years later, for a dwindling group, the hope remains.  
> > This is
> > > one of the most fascinating lenses to view people's beliefs.  
The
> > > question for me is "how could otherwise bright people believe
> > > something so patently absurd?"  The answer to that question 
goes 
> > right
> > > to the heart of how humans develop beliefs.  It goes to the 
heart 
> > of
> > > what makes us human, and may be the thing that ends up 
destroying 
> > us.  
> > > 
> > > Right now different groups in the Middle East believe that God 
gave
> > > them a piece of land.  Based on that belief they are killing 
each
> > > other.  How can people believe that hopping is the first stage 
of
> > > flying, or that God gave their group a piece of land?  We all 
have 
> > to
> > > find our own answers don't we?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Dave" <bikemaster@> 
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Here's the point:
> > > > 
> > > > Photographs aside, a critical thinker will ask if there is 
any 
> > > > evidence that anyone has ever levitated. There is not.
> > > > 
> > > > No one is going to levitate either, I'm asserting.
> > > > 
> > > > It's all more BS from the TMO. Those who believe that 
levitation 
> > is 
> > > > happening or will happen are probably those who accept 
> > everything 
> > > > that "MMY says," without any critical examination. I, for 
one, 
> > think 
> > > > it's all crap ... VooDoo TM, was was referenced earlier.
> > > > 
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" 
> > <shempmcgurk@> 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" 
<jstein@> 
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" 
> > > > > <shempmcgurk@> 
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" 
> > <jstein@> 
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" 
> > > > > > > <shempmcgurk@> 
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --- In 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" 
> > > > > <jstein@> 
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --- In 
> > FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" 
> > > > > > > > > <shempmcgurk@> 
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
> > new.morning 
> > > > > > > > <no_reply@> 
> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In 
> > FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" 
> > > > > > > > <jstein@> 
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just for the record, since about 1984, 
the 
> > TMO 
> > > > has
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > been quite clear that actual flying has 
not 
> > yet 
> > > > been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > achieved, and that all practitioners are 
> > doing is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > hopping.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, but 1977-1983 were some crazy, mixed-
up, 
> > wild-
> > > > > ass 
> > > > > > > > > > years. :)
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > ...add dishonesty to the mix.
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > Publishing photos of flyers in the uppermost 
> > apex of 
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > hopping parabola is, intentially, deceitful 
and 
> > > > that's 
> > > > > > > > > > > > exactly what the TMO did.  There's 100+ 
possible 
> > > > points 
> > > > > > in 
> > > > > > > > > > > > the hopping parabola...gee, why pick the one 
at 
> > the 
> > > > > apex 
> > > > > > to 
> > > > > > > > > > > > publicize?
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > Uh, Shemp, you need to give this one just a
> > > > > > > > > > > *teeeeeensy* bit more thought.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Enlighten me, Judy, why it was NOT dishonest 
> > publicizing 
> > > > > > > > > > photographs of flyers in the apex of the hopping 
> > > > parabola...
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Think it through, Shemp.  Start by explaining the
> > > > > > > > > "deception" involved:
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 1. What would someone assume *incorrectly* if they 
saw
> > > > > > > > > a photo taken at the apex of the parabola rather 
than
> > > > > > > > > at a lower point?
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Gee, I dunno, Judy, that the person was LEVITATING 
and 
> > > > FLOATING
> > > > > > > > in the air maybe?????
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > BZZZZT.  Why would they NOT think that if the photo
> > > > > > > were taken at a lower point of the parabola?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Try again, please.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 2. What would their *correct* assumption be if the 
hop
> > > > > > > > > were shown at a lower point?
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Think it through, Judy, and ask yourself who should 
be 
> > doing 
> > > > > > > > the assuming:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Non sequitur.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > those promoting and distributing photos of alleged 
> > > > > > > > levitation....or...those reading their papers over 
their
> > > > > > > > morning coffee.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Do you think that the TMO acted morally and honestly 
> > back in 
> > > > > > > > the '70s when they released those photos?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I'll address that once you've addressed the "point
> > > > > > > on the parabola" issue.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Every time you can't answer a question or you are 
befuddled, 
> > you 
> > > > > > always do the same thing: you say "I'll answer that once 
> > you've 
> > > > > > addressed my question".
> > > > > 
> > > > > Translation: Shemp realizes his bit about the point
> > > > > on the parabola was REEEEEELY dumb.  He can't admit
> > > > > that, of course, so he tries to change the subject.
> > > > > That doesn't work, so now he thinks he'll try
> > > > > projecting *his* befuddlement and inability to answer
> > > > > *my* questions onto *me*.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I guess he thinks at least some folks here are dumb
> > > > > enough to fall for it.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > do me a favor: ignore my posts and don't comment on them 
> > > > anymore, 
> > > > > > please.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Sorry, but I'll continue to comment exactly as I see fit.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>







------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Yahoo! Groups gets a make over. See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/XISQkA/lOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to