Both you guys need to either get out more often or you
need to get laid. I'm not sure which one it is.

--- peterklutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> You avoided the question directed at you.
> 
> This makes you either a chicken, a moron or an
> asshole..
> 
> Make your pick - and do feel free to spread your
> totalitarian manure
> elsewhere in the future.
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "sparaig"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "peterklutz"
> <peterklutz@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig"
> <sparaig@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You log in with an anonymous IP AFTER being
> banned from making
> > > edits, and do full-
> > > > scale reverts. Lame.
> > > > 
> > > > BTW do you always refer to yourself in the 3rd
> person? I know a few
> > > enlightened types do 
> > > > that on occasion but you're sure not coming
> accross that way.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --- In [email protected],
> "peterklutz" <peterklutz@>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In [email protected],
> "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Does anyone know Peter Klutz personally?
> He's engaging in
> non-stop
> > > > > vandalism on 
> > > > > > wikipedia.
> > > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > I do (I think).
> > > > > 
> > > > > Before the propaganda by wikipeda et al
> makes you fully
> brainwashed,
> > > > > here'sa recap followed by some assorted
> comments:
> > > > > 
> > > > > (1) PK started out like he supposed most
> other people start with
> > > > > making contributions at WP, with the
> innocent joy of creating
> > > > > something only a newbie can muster. He was
> immediatelly
> attacked by
> > > > > numerous accounts accusing him of vandalism
> and violations of
> whatever
> > > > > "rules" exist at wikipedia.
> > > > > 
> > > > > It would take PK a month or so to realize
> that he had skipped
> right
> > > > > into a carefully moulded minefield.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Because this is what WP apparently has
> petrified into:
> controversial
> > > > > articles have been appropriated by clicques
> of people who scream
> > > > > bloody murder and throw the V word at anyone
> who thinks he or
> she can
> > > > > contribute, whilst ingratiating themselves
> with admins.        
> > > > > 
> > > > > True to his nature (but unfortunatelly still
> too innocent for this
> > > > > world) PK became pissed off at these attacks
> and held his
> ground. His
> > > > > greatest mistake, however, was to take the
> allegations against
> TM and
> > > > > MMY at face value and investigate the
> sources. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > When this was done - and it was apparent
> that the TM and MMY
> articels
> > > > > have been kidnapped by entities dedicatedly
> hostile to TM etc - he
> > > > > said so.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The rest, as it is said, is history.
> > > > > 
> > > > > (2) Instead of caving in to the constant
> barrage of allegations
> > > > > against PK, sparaig, take a couple of steps
> back and review the
> > > > > situation. Here are a few suggestions:
> > > > > 
> > > > > a. compare Mr Skolnicks interpretation of
> wikipedia rules with the
> > > > > rules themselves. When you do this, you're
> actually going to learn
> > > > > that what S is trying to portray as rules
> are in fact more like
> > > > > guidelines - guidelines found on pages that
> can actually be
> edited and
> > > > > thus changed by anyone. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Perhaps more surprisingly, you will also
> come across the word
> "bold",
> > > > > which is how Mr Jimbo Wales, want's your
> contributions to be
> like (and
> > > > > there's a backdrop to my questions to
> Bishonento what'sgone
> wrong with
> > > > > WP - duly deleted by S).
> > > > > 
> > > > > b. compare PK's NPA violations with S
> violations or even those
> of some
> > > > > of the admins. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > c. PK's view on what's going on at WP is
> that it is a social
> > > > > experiement gone terrbiely wrong: S and his
> admins has rapidly
> formed
> > > > > a secterian-minded group based on hate
> toward outsiders (in
> this case
> > > > > people they label TMers) where relations are
> now so tight that
> S feel
> > > > > comfortable enough to publicly joke about
> his gratitude of the
> admins
> > > > > at WP for their willingess to enroll in S's
> personal axis of
> evil of
> > > > > Jewish-Christian fundamentalism.
> > > > > 
> > > > > PK's take on the situation is that the
> phenomenon is akin to how
> > > > > people a few hundred years ago worked up a
> frenzy in order to
> be able
> > > > > to torch witches at the stake. I say this
> half-jokiugly, but the
> > > > > discrepancy between PK's contributions per
> se and how they are
> > > > > described by S adn assorted WP admins has to
> be seen to be
> believed.
> > > > > So has the bile produced at WP over it all.
> > > > > 
> > > > > d. Finally, how many people actually read
> the TM and MMY
> articles at
> > > > > WP? I'd be surprised if anyone outside a
> circle made up of
> yourself,
> > > > > Bishonen and other WP admins - and S - do
> this.   
> > > > > 
> > > > > "Never mind the mosquitoues - shoot the
> tiger."
> > > > > 
> > > > > Why engage in pointless communications with
> the mosquitoes of this
> > > > > world, when you can go to DC or FF? 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > PK
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Who appointed Andrew Skolnick and wikipedia the
> arbitrators of free
> > > speech?
> > 
> > The owner of Wikipedia controls wikipedia, and
> people who play by
> his rules get to 
> > continue playing. BTW, while Skolnick usually
> knows how to play the
> game well enough to 
> > slip in his POV, in the long run, he gets
> corrected. 
=== message truncated ===


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to