--- In [email protected], Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Both you guys need to either get out more often or you > need to get laid. I'm not sure which one it is.
Why not get out *and* get laid? It's summer. :-) > --- peterklutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > You avoided the question directed at you. > > > > This makes you either a chicken, a moron or an > > asshole.. > > > > Make your pick - and do feel free to spread your > > totalitarian manure > > elsewhere in the future. > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" > > <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "peterklutz" > > <peterklutz@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" > > <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > You log in with an anonymous IP AFTER being > > banned from making > > > > edits, and do full- > > > > > scale reverts. Lame. > > > > > > > > > > BTW do you always refer to yourself in the 3rd > > person? I know a few > > > > enlightened types do > > > > > that on occasion but you're sure not coming > > accross that way. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], > > "peterklutz" <peterklutz@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], > > "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does anyone know Peter Klutz personally? > > He's engaging in > > non-stop > > > > > > vandalism on > > > > > > > wikipedia. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I do (I think). > > > > > > > > > > > > Before the propaganda by wikipeda et al > > makes you fully > > brainwashed, > > > > > > here'sa recap followed by some assorted > > comments: > > > > > > > > > > > > (1) PK started out like he supposed most > > other people start with > > > > > > making contributions at WP, with the > > innocent joy of creating > > > > > > something only a newbie can muster. He was > > immediatelly > > attacked by > > > > > > numerous accounts accusing him of vandalism > > and violations of > > whatever > > > > > > "rules" exist at wikipedia. > > > > > > > > > > > > It would take PK a month or so to realize > > that he had skipped > > right > > > > > > into a carefully moulded minefield. > > > > > > > > > > > > Because this is what WP apparently has > > petrified into: > > controversial > > > > > > articles have been appropriated by clicques > > of people who scream > > > > > > bloody murder and throw the V word at anyone > > who thinks he or > > she can > > > > > > contribute, whilst ingratiating themselves > > with admins. > > > > > > > > > > > > True to his nature (but unfortunatelly still > > too innocent for this > > > > > > world) PK became pissed off at these attacks > > and held his > > ground. His > > > > > > greatest mistake, however, was to take the > > allegations against > > TM and > > > > > > MMY at face value and investigate the > > sources. > > > > > > > > > > > > When this was done - and it was apparent > > that the TM and MMY > > articels > > > > > > have been kidnapped by entities dedicatedly > > hostile to TM etc - he > > > > > > said so. > > > > > > > > > > > > The rest, as it is said, is history. > > > > > > > > > > > > (2) Instead of caving in to the constant > > barrage of allegations > > > > > > against PK, sparaig, take a couple of steps > > back and review the > > > > > > situation. Here are a few suggestions: > > > > > > > > > > > > a. compare Mr Skolnicks interpretation of > > wikipedia rules with the > > > > > > rules themselves. When you do this, you're > > actually going to learn > > > > > > that what S is trying to portray as rules > > are in fact more like > > > > > > guidelines - guidelines found on pages that > > can actually be > > edited and > > > > > > thus changed by anyone. > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps more surprisingly, you will also > > come across the word > > "bold", > > > > > > which is how Mr Jimbo Wales, want's your > > contributions to be > > like (and > > > > > > there's a backdrop to my questions to > > Bishonento what'sgone > > wrong with > > > > > > WP - duly deleted by S). > > > > > > > > > > > > b. compare PK's NPA violations with S > > violations or even those > > of some > > > > > > of the admins. > > > > > > > > > > > > c. PK's view on what's going on at WP is > > that it is a social > > > > > > experiement gone terrbiely wrong: S and his > > admins has rapidly > > formed > > > > > > a secterian-minded group based on hate > > toward outsiders (in > > this case > > > > > > people they label TMers) where relations are > > now so tight that > > S feel > > > > > > comfortable enough to publicly joke about > > his gratitude of the > > admins > > > > > > at WP for their willingess to enroll in S's > > personal axis of > > evil of > > > > > > Jewish-Christian fundamentalism. > > > > > > > > > > > > PK's take on the situation is that the > > phenomenon is akin to how > > > > > > people a few hundred years ago worked up a > > frenzy in order to > > be able > > > > > > to torch witches at the stake. I say this > > half-jokiugly, but the > > > > > > discrepancy between PK's contributions per > > se and how they are > > > > > > described by S adn assorted WP admins has to > > be seen to be > > believed. > > > > > > So has the bile produced at WP over it all. > > > > > > > > > > > > d. Finally, how many people actually read > > the TM and MMY > > articles at > > > > > > WP? I'd be surprised if anyone outside a > > circle made up of > > yourself, > > > > > > Bishonen and other WP admins - and S - do > > this. > > > > > > > > > > > > "Never mind the mosquitoues - shoot the > > tiger." > > > > > > > > > > > > Why engage in pointless communications with > > the mosquitoes of this > > > > > > world, when you can go to DC or FF? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PK > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Who appointed Andrew Skolnick and wikipedia the > > arbitrators of free > > > > speech? > > > > > > The owner of Wikipedia controls wikipedia, and > > people who play by > > his rules get to > > > continue playing. BTW, while Skolnick usually > > knows how to play the > > game well enough to > > > slip in his POV, in the long run, he gets > > corrected. > === message truncated === > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
