--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], bob_brigante > > > > <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > > on the lie that Israel did not deliberately target the UN: > > > > > > > > It seems to me *vanisingly* unlikely that Israel > > > > deliberately targeted the U.N. observers. > > > > > > Vanisingly? And highlighted? > > > > Desperate for a putdown, eh, Barry? > > Not at all. I was merely being "Green," and recycling > one of yours. :-)
Um, right. I was actually commenting on your inability to come up with any solid putdowns in your previous couple of attempts. > See, my point is that when *you* say these things, > about the people you don't like, you think that not > only is it OK, it's somehow noble. Barry. They're *twits*. Nothing "noble" about 'em. When you engage in twitting, it's fine and dandy. When I do it, it's somehow indicative of my cult mindset, or my deteriorating mental health, or my gross hypocrisy, or something. Lighten up, for goodness' sake. For your own sake. Like you probably > felt when you posted this one, suggesting what spelling > errors really "mean" -- > > > > (When Barry's usually excellent spelling goes > > > on the blink, it's usually a sign that he's > > > really, really close to the edge, if we didn't > > > know that already from the nitwittery of his > > > recent posts.) ...) > > > -- Judy Stein, FFL, Jul 27, 2006 > > Then when someone applies your *own* words to you > in a similar situation, suddenly that person is > "desperate for a putdown." > > Can we assume that you *weren't*, when you wrote > the original putdown above? Yes, you can assume I wasn't desperate for a putdown, given all the opportunities you've been providing lately, such as your hilariously off-target fantasies about my purported lifelong inability to attract men, your inexplicable notion that I imagine "hoardes [sic] of persecutors," and your impossibly convoluted attempt to relate them to each other: "I cannot help but laugh at women who in their old age imagine hoardes [sic] of persecutors the same way they imagined hoardes [sic] of suitors when they were young, therefore I exist." The last phrase doesn't even make sense syntactically. Oh, and your "hoardes" was clearly a spelling error, in contrast to my "vanisingly," which was obviously a typo. (Not that I never make spelling errors, but they're usually in more difficult words; and I don't tend to get all freaked out when somebody notices them.) > Can we further assume that calling me a drunk, which > you have now done twice in one week when you *were* > desperate for a putdown and couldn't think of anything > else to say, is representative of the kind of integrity, > honesty, fairness, and lack of hypocrisy you claim to > represent here? I think you're not really in a position to ask such a question given the demented outburst I just quoted above. Here, let's have another look at it: "I cannot help but laugh at women who in their old age imagine hoardes [sic] of persecutors the same way they imagined hoardes [sic] of suitors when they were young, therefore I exist." So I'll just point out that in both those instances, I did indeed have other things to say (unlike you in the post I quoted). The "lay off the sauce" and "absinthe" remarks were by way of postscripts to my preceding commentary on the utterly nonsensical nature of the posts of yours I was responding to. And they were at least germane to the points I had made, unlike your hapless attempt above, which was your *only* point and didn't even make any sense. > You just keep on claiming that everyone *except* you is > a hypocrite, Judy, and I'll keep collecting your own > quotes to post in response when you do. Sure, go right ahead. That's even more opportunities for me to point out how badly you're losing it, as I just finished doing with this current post. You used to take "vacations" from alt.m.t when you found yourself getting into a really bad state; maybe you should consider doing so here as well, deal with whatever's going wrong in your life so the hysteria doesn't spill over into FFL. > "What should it tell us that Barry and Vaj do exactly the > same thing they accuse TMers of doing, I wonder?" > -- Judy Stein, FFL, Jul 15, 2006 > To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
