--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yes, you can assume I wasn't desperate for a > > putdown, given all the opportunities you've > > been providing lately, such as your hilariously > > off-target fantasies about my purported lifelong > > inability to attract men, your inexplicable > > notion that I imagine "hoardes [sic] of > > persecutors," and your impossibly convoluted > > attempt to relate them to each other: > > > > "I cannot help but laugh at women who in their > > old age imagine hoardes [sic] of persecutors the > > same way they imagined hoardes [sic] of suitors > > when they were young, therefore I exist." > > > > The last phrase doesn't even make sense syntactically. > > I see. As opposed to: > > >> Kinda makes you rethink all the research that > >> claims benefits for long-term TMers, eh? :-) > > > > Yer gonna need knee-replacement surgery soon, Barry. > -- Judy Stein, FFL, Jul 24, 2006 > > And your response makes sense in what universe? :-)
The universe in which you suffer from compulsively jerking knees, of course. Good grief, it wasn't *that* oblique! And it makes perfect sense syntactically as well as conceptually, unlike yours. > > Oh, and your "hoardes" was clearly a spelling error, > > in contrast to my "vanisingly," which was obviously > > a typo. > > > > (Not that I never make spelling errors, but they're > > usually in more difficult words; and I don't tend > > to get all freaked out when somebody notices them.) > > Two quotes for this one: > > 1) > "If you had just said, "Oh, yeah, I should have used the > term 'process' rather than 'experience,'" that would > have been that. We all inadvertently goof on the > terminology from time to time. > The fact that you're going way around Robin Hood's barn > to deny you used the wrong term suggests that either you > still don't understand *why* it's the wrong term, or that > you find it necessary to try to cover up the mistake." > -- Judy Stein, FFL, Jul 24, 2006 > > 2) > >> Says the pot to the kettle. > > > > Hardly. When I make a mistake, I admit it. > -- Judy Stein, FFL, Jul 24, 2006 And the relevance of these is what, exactly? I didn't deny the typo, to the contrary. You know the difference between a typo and a spelling error. Yours was a spelling error, among other indications because you made it twice in the same sentence. BARRY, YOU'RE LOSING IT. > > > Can we further assume that calling me a drunk, which > > > you have now done twice in one week when you *were* > > > desperate for a putdown and couldn't think of anything > > > else to say, is representative of the kind of integrity, > > > honesty, fairness, and lack of hypocrisy you claim to > > > represent here? > > > > I think you're not really in a position to ask such > > a question given the demented outburst I just quoted > > above. > > It is still my honest opinion of you, mispelling > and all, demented though it may be. And it was > written stone sober. Here...I'll write another, > three weeks now into having touched no alcohol > at all (because I'm on a diet...I don't have > anything against alcohol, just its calories): Wow, another nerve. Maybe your problem is that you're *off* the bottle, come to think of it. > All of this attacking me lately is because I > pointed out how much of a hypocrite you are in > your posturing as the defender of all things TM > here, Uh, no, I defend only *some* things TM here. And you started attacking me compulsively well before that point anyway. My return fire has nothing to do with the specific topic. They're all very creaky reruns anyway. when in fact you have never done anything > in your life to put your actions where your mouth > and your ego are. Au contraire, Pierre. > You never became a TM teacher, <snore> > and by the fact that you avoided answering my > question about whether you had ever even checked > someone Sorry, I meant to and forgot. I've said before, though, both here and on alt.m.t, that I never got to take the certification exam, so you were well aware already that I'd never checked anybody. , I assume that you haven't -- you just > learned the procedure so you could use it to put > people down when it came up on a.m.t. ROTFL!! I took checker training a decade before alt.m.t even *existed*. > You haven't > done diddley, and you never will. Well, yes, I have, actually, and may do again at some point (with regard to TM; other activities are ongoing). But I'll just remind everyone of this little gem: "The others here have *paid* their dues in the past, and in my opinion that entitles them to make their own decisions in the present with regard to how much they want to participate in the latest Maharishi 'call to action.'" In other words, because I haven't "paid my dues" in exactly the way Barry thinks I should have, I am therefore *not entitled*, according to him, to make my own decisions as to whether I can go on the current course. You're all talk, > in it only for the "credit" you seek so desperately. Don't seek any "credit," nope. That's your fantasy, Barry. > One last quote, in which you are honest for once > about what you *really* think of all the people > here at Fairfield Life: > > "At the time, I had really been trying to cut down > on the number of arguments I got into. After that, > I said screw it. There will always be a few people > who dislike me enough to falsely portray what's gone > on in an exchange, That would be you and Shemp and Vaj, of course. and not enough of the rest are > interested in what's true and what's not to do a > fair evaluation and give me credit for trying to > *avoid* an argument." > -- Judy Stein, FFL, Jul 27, 2006 Hell, that isn't just what *I* think, that's what folks here have said themselves. They're just not interested in those "petty squabbles" over who said what to whom when. You and Shemp and Vaj get to lie a blue streak without any fear of anybody but me calling you on it. You're just digging yourself deeper and deeper into your mucky hole, Barry. At some point it's going to cave in on you. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
