On Aug 2, 2006, at 11:48 AM, sparaig wrote:

--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:




On Aug 1, 2006, at 5:38 PM, sparaig wrote:



It's the dfference between relative and absolute, played out  

neurologically within the brain.

OR, the experience of this within the brain, leads one to describe  

the world in these terms.

Either way, its radically different than the high concentration  

Buddhist meditation findings

that Vaj likes to tout here.



Actually Vaj has never "touted" any meditation technique here that  

uses "high concentration". As Dana Sawyer pointed out in some  

previous quotes shared here: meditators using these techniques are  

able to transcend easier, longer and more frequently.



Dana does EEG/fMRI research on meditators?


Not that I'm aware of. Why should he? Experientially it's very easy to see the difference.


 This is  


accomplished by teaching students to find their own unique balance  

between subtle effort and no effort. Eventually meditation become  

totally (and truly) effortless: one sits, decides how long, and  

simply goes into samadhi/shamatha for the entire session! Once one  

can sustain transcendence for longer periods of time (IME over about  

10 minutes) one can also decide to practice non-dual forms of  

meditation, which unlike what you describe where the senses disengage  

from objects and withdraw (or "retire"/transcend) and separate inner  

and outer into a dualistic divide--one can instead cultivate unity  

consciousness and work with methods which leave the senses "open".  

And this is the natural sequence in learning meditation: going from  

meditation requiring "supports" (e.g. a mantra) to no support.




Where's the research?


None was necessary, although there's research out there for those who need that crutch.

The direct experience is the important thing. 

__._,_.___

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




__,_._,___

Reply via email to