--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" 
> <shempmcgurk@> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" 
> > > <shempmcgurk@> 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steven klayman 
> > > > <thedoc108@> 
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Gerbal 88-You are out of your mind if you think you
> > > > > > > are going to be able to engage in an inteligent
> > > > > > > discourse with Sparaig. He spends much of his day
> > > > > > > defending a position that almost everybody has
> > > > > > > abandoned years or decades ago- namely that TM is the
> > > > > > > best technique and produces enlightenment.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Actually, he doesn't.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Spare Egg spends most of his day defending present-day 
TMO 
> > > > > > policies, NOT so much either the TM Technique or the TM 
> > Program.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Actually, what Lawson does (and I do) is not so much
> > > > > defend present-day TMO policies as make the positive
> > > > > case for them.  (There's a difference.)
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > To your credit, Judy, I really don't think you spend much 
time 
> > > > either defending or making a positive case for things such as
> > > > Rajas, weighing bumpkins in gold, Maharishi Peanut Butter, 
etc.
> > > 
> > > Come to think of it,
> > 
> > The mere fact you had to search your memory for the few times 
you 
> > have -- weighed against a plethora of daily postings -- further 
> > makes my point.
> 
> Um, no, Shemp (or wait, is it Peter Klutz?  No,
> it's Shemp).  See if you can figure out why that
> makes no sense at all.



Uh, no Judy, I won't.




> 
> 
> 
> > > I *have* made a positive case for
> > > the Rajas several times; and each time the weighing-in-
> > > gold thing comes up I've had to point out that the gold
> > > was to further his research, not to fill his own pockets.
> > > 
> > > And the other day I came across something--can't remember
> > > where--about some other occasion in India where someone
> > > received their weight in gold for something or other.  I
> > > got the distinct impression from the way it was described
> > > that it's a traditional way of honoring someone in India.
> > > If that's the case, then it wasn't a stunt that MMY
> > > dreamed up out of nowhere; and it may have been designed
> > > to appeal to Indians specifically.
> > >
> >
>







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to