[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >In a message dated 8/10/06 8:33:39 P.M. Central Daylight Time, >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > >>>So you weren't pulling for an independent investigation of 911? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>An independent investigation of 9-11 would be great and is very needed. >> >> >> >>My point >> >> >> >And so you don't believe the "official version" either and also admit >that this alert might be bogus or a setup? > > > > >No , you missed it. "my point" was had the terrorist been successful you >would have been demanding another investigation as to how this could happen, >as >you just did, see above. As for me, I thought the official 911 investigation >was simply a political circus. And no I don't think this is a setup but I'm >sure you are going to wish it were. > No, you are *assuming* why I want an independent 9-11 investigation. I think the "official story" is a cover-up and 9-11 was an inside job and a failed false flag operation. That's why I don't trust this alert especially due to it's timing.
To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
