--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 8/12/06 8:22:28 A.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > So it is "evil" to abort a fetus because of it's sex? > > "Evil" in this case meaning having negative > consequences. "Lesser of two evils" is what we > call a figure of speech. > > > > Allowing the Chinese to abort any child they want may have a very positive > consequence from their perspective. When such a high value is placed on males > > and low value on females, the females are aborted under the one child policy, > > making an over abundance of males and too few females in the future. This > means fewer women to bare children of either sex. It also means a humongous > amount of unmarried young men fit for the military life. God! Isn't central > planning wonderful? >
Except it hasn't worked out that way. And the CHinese HAVE backed off from the social planning thing, to a great extent. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
