--- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Based on the theory of the ME you are absolutely > > correct. If the TMO/MUM was serious about > > understanding the field effects of consciousness > they > > would have to understand why the ME does not > appear to > > work in Fairfield and expand the ME theory to > > integrate this apparent contradiction. > > How exceedingly odd that you deleted Lawson's > detailed explanation of why the ME does not appear > to work in Fairfield, and then claimed there wasn't > any. > > I can understand why Bill's response to what Lawson > wrote completely ignores Lawson's explanation as if > it had never existed, but I'm baffled that you would > do the same thing, Peter. Maybe I was too hasty in my snipping. I'll be more careful next time. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
