--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], new.morning <no_reply@> wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > I read DOJ's analysis. Its distrurbing that it is so shallow and has
> > > so many unaddressed (or only partially addressed) questionable
> > > metheodological issues.
> > 
> > Why don't you email him your analysis and see if
> > he has a rebuttal?
> >
> 
> Of course, I didn't see his webpage as presenting any massively
persuasive evidence of the 
> ME in Fairfield and I suspect he doesn't either.

He closes, "it can be seen from this study that MIU/MUM had a
consistent, dramatic effect on Fairfield crime for almost 20 years." I
interpret that as he is pretty convinced of an ME effect in  FF. A
higher level of conviction than you appear to have. 







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to