--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 8/19/06 5:36:30 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Yes, they do. When you ask explicitly about WARRANTLESS > wiretapping, a majority oppose it. > > From my earlier post: > > Associated Press, 1/3-5/2006 > > Should the Bush Administration be required to get a warrant from a > judge before monitoring phone and Internet communications between > American citizens in the United States and suspected terrorists, or > should the government be allowed to monitor such communications > without a warrant? > > Required to get warrant, 56% > Monitor without a warrant, 42% > Unsure, 2% > > _http://www.ap-http://www.aphttp_ (http://www.ap-ipsosresults.com/) > > > Tapping citizens on domestic calls without a > > warrant is an entirely different situation. > > I was pretty sure you'd try to bluff your way > through this one once you'd been called on it. > Very disappointing. > > > > > As I mentioned earlier the date of your poll was in January or 2006. The > date of my poll is May 11 2006. Evidently people have changed their minds > and > support the program in place once they heard the debate. >
Or had forgotten the debate in the first place. What do the polls show now about the President vs the courts. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
