--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 8/19/06 6:04:32 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > I Have to stand by the Poll as it is. People have known from the get go that > > the calls in question, that are tapped with out a warrant, are calls > coming > > into the US from suspected terrorists and most people don't care if they > are > > tapped without a warrant. Tapping citizens on domestic calls without a > > warrant is an entirely different situation. > > > > So you believ e that the President of teh USA doesn't have to follow a law > set by Congress? > > > > > I didn't say that at all. I think the more appropriate question is does the > president have the authority to wire tap without a warrant involving > national > security in a time of war. Lincoln suspended Habius Corpus, FDR did a number > of things that would make the hair stand on end of democrats today, one of > them was interring Japanese Americans in camps. >
Congress has set up a law requiring him to get a warrant after-the-fact. Are you saying that, in the day and age of instant communcations, the President doesn't have to follow the law because Lincoln didn't? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
