[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >In a message dated 8/19/06 6:04:32 P.M. Central Daylight Time, >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >I Have to stand by the Poll as it is. People have known from the get go that > > >> the calls in question, that are tapped with out a warrant, are calls >> >> >coming > > >>into the US from suspected terrorists and most people don't care if they >> >> >are > > >>tapped without a warrant. Tapping citizens on domestic calls without a >>warrant is an entirely different situation. >> >> >> > >So you believ e that the President of teh USA doesn't have to follow a law >set by Congress? > > > > >I didn't say that at all. I think the more appropriate question is does the >president have the authority to wire tap without a warrant involving national >security in a time of war. Lincoln suspended Habius Corpus, FDR did a number >of things that would make the hair stand on end of democrats today, one of >them was interring Japanese Americans in camps. > What exactly is wrong with him getting a warrant? The country isn't exactly crawling with terrorists. Terrrorism is just an excuse they use to take away our rights that they don't like we peons having. That's part of the NeoCon doctrine. We need to fight them every step of the way just as if they are terrorists which they are in my book whether YOU like it or not.
To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
