--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>  
> In a message dated 8/20/06 7:40:31 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
>  
>  
>  
> --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
(mailto:[email protected]) 
> ,  "Patrick Gillam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> >
> > ---  MDixon wrote:
> > >
> > > Presidents always have to follow the  law. However the question 
> is, is there 
> > > any wiggle room in  that law under extraordinary circumstances 
> such as war. The 
> > >  presidential legal teams think there is. Remember Lincoln 
> suspended Habius  
> > > corpus, shut down the Maryland legislature and restricted free  
> speech to some 
> > > degree. FDR had people's mail censored and  detained Japanese 
in 
> internment 
> > > camps. LBJ had mail censored  coming from troops in Vietnam. 
And 
> I'm certain 
> > > there are  many more examples of powers that presidents have 
been 
> able to enact  
> > > in times of war for national security.
> > 
> > MD, you  recount these extreme measures by past presidents 
> > as if they were all  justified. I'm not ready to assume they 
> > were. For example, I've  encountered many citations of 
> > Lincoln suspending writs of habeas  corpus, but not one 
> > citation has ever said, "And history proves he  was 
> > correct to do so." Same with FDR's internment of 
> >  Japanese Americans.
> > 
> > If history teaches me anything from the  above 
> > examples, it's that presidents take reprehensible 
> >  actions under stress.
> 
> Nixon did a whole lot of warrantless  wiretapping,
> so it should be OK for Bush to do it too, right?
> 
> Er,  no. That's why the FISA Act was passed in 1978,
> to KEEP presidents from  doing warrantless
> wiretapping, to ensure they had no reason to  say,
> Well, gee, it was terribly urgent and a matter of
> national  security, and we just couldn't wait to 
> get a  warrant...
> 
> And just who was Nixon wire tapping? Democrats on domestic lines.
> Good reason to pass FISA. Bush is intercepting foreign calls
> coming into the US from known or suspected terrorist in a war on 
> terror.

That's what he *says* he's doing.  But because there's
no OVERSIGHT--because he does not have to get warrants--
there's no way to tell.  He could be tapping domestic
calls from Democrats, and we'd never know it.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to