--- In [email protected], Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on 8/21/06 8:42 PM, new.morning at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> > So it would appear that Ricks friend does not fit the profile -- with > >> > physiological markers, of someone "in" TMO CC. Thus, it appears there > >> > are people in FF, and elsewhere probably, who are proclaiming being > >> > "awakened' -- which may very well be a substantial and wonderful > >> > thing. But it is different form the TMO's CC. Maybe better, maybe not. > > > Or maybe it¹s the same, but the roadmap is sketchy, and the tools of > physiological measurement primitive.
"60"? people fit the physiological profile just fine with todays instruments. The tools of physiological measurement for TMO CC -- their definition -- are not primitive, sketchy or ineffective. Your friend does not fit the physiological profile, and definition , of TMO style CC. Period. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
