Yeah, that "disruptive" thing is tough to figure out. They are claiming that 
it's the decisive 
factor in "most" of the rejections, which totalled 16 when I first applied a 
couple of weeks 
ago. I know 4 or 5 of them personally and still don't get it. For example, 
what's so fucking 
disruptive about David Hawthorne? I'm sure Tim Britton would leave his bagpipes 
outside 
if they asked him nicely. Were they expecting Shiva Ma to perform homa on the 
foma? 
Could it be that David Bousefield was going to ambush CPs with his outlaw 
Deeksha?

L B S

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "dhamiltony2k5" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> presence in the Dome would be "disruptive". 
> Disruptive?  Hah,it is about MOJO.  Oh heck L B, Bevan just thinks 
> you got more MOJO than Bevan or any Raja worth a million.  It is 
> pretty obvious.  Yeah, you're just a weapon of mass destruction in 
> their book.
> 
> Best Regards fra FF,
> 
> -Doug
> 
> 
> Oh BTW, L B, the next time you try to apply they will take you to 
> the library basement where normal people do not go and then show you 
> the 'rack'.  It worked on Galileo. It worked on that wrong thinking 
> before, you'll sing like a bird too recanting everything and signing 
> about anything to git back in.  Appeasement, it did not work before 
> with Hilter either.
> 
> 
> 
>    --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "L B Shriver" 
> <l_b_shriver@> wrote:The resistance to my acceptance is pretty 
> localized in the upper regions of the
> administration, although the perception there is that it is more 
> widespread.
> Therefore
> there is some fear that my presence in the Dome would 
> be "disruptive". 
> 
> Doug writing:  oh heck LB, they just think you got more MOJO than 
> Bevan or any Raja worth a million.  It is pretty obvious.
> 
> 
> >
> > Reply below.
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "dhamiltony2k5" 
> <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote:
> > >
> > >  "L B Shriver" <l_b_shriver@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear Friends at FFLife,
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > >  "I was officially informed on Sunday that I am not considered 
> eligible 
> > > at this time to 
> > >  participate, after nearly a month of having my application "in 
> > > process"."
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Of course not.  They would have to eat way too much crow to let 
> you in.
> > > 
> > > -Doug in FF
> > 
> > ********
> > 
> > The resistance to my acceptance is pretty localized in the upper 
> regions of the 
> > administration, although the perception there is that it is more 
> widespread. Therefore 
> > there is some fear that my presence in the Dome would 
> be "disruptive". This is essentially 
> > the Weapons of Mass Destruction argument—it is convenient, but 
> doesn't match the facts 
> > on the ground. They don't perceive that most people would rather 
> have them let me in and 
> > drop this blacklisting bullshit.
> > 
> > Despite that, my application actually did get into the region 
> where acceptance was a 
> > possibility. There just wasn't enough momentum behind it to carry 
> it through this time.
> > 
> > From my point of view, this situation represents progress, and I 
> believe that if you want 
> > more of something in life, it's good to show appreciation.
> > 
> > L B S
> >
>






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to