--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <drpetersutphen@> wrote: <snip> > > > Having worked in TV production for many years in my > > > first career, I doubt such a complex sequence would be > > > left to chance and shot over and over again until it > > > came out right. It would cost way too much because of > > > the time involved. A producer would say ,"NO WAY" to > > > the expense. I believe the production story is just a > > > fun, false story. > > > > Bzzzzzzt. Nice try, but no cigar: > > > > http://www.snopes.com/autos/business/hondacog.asp > > I stand corrected. It could have been done for much > cheaper using CGI, I suspect.
Of course it could have. But it would have looked like CGI. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/