--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <drpetersutphen@> 
wrote:
<snip>
> > > Having worked in TV production for many years in my
> > > first career, I doubt such a complex sequence would be
> > > left to chance and shot over and over again until it
> > > came out right. It would cost way too much because of
> > > the time involved. A producer would say ,"NO WAY" to
> > > the expense. I believe the production story is just a
> > > fun, false story. 
> > 
> > Bzzzzzzt. Nice try, but no cigar:
> > 
> > http://www.snopes.com/autos/business/hondacog.asp
> 
> I stand corrected. It could have been done for much
> cheaper using CGI, I suspect.

Of course it could have.  But it would have looked
like CGI.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to