--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > Of course, I assume that intentional transcending is > > actually a different physical state than spontaneous > > transcending, and that the former is an illusion, > > while the latter is based on a simple physical change > > in how the brain processes information, as a for > > example of where I'm coming from. > > So you're saying, essentially, that the fundamental > assumption and bias you bring to any TM research that > you participate in is based on the idea of elitism, > that TM is unique and better than any other technique, > right? > > Again, thanks for being honest about the level of > your TM elitism, but I think that as a result we can > safely disregard anything you might "discover" in > conjunction with Fred as actually having anything > to do with science. >
IOW, if my elitism is supported, it can't be because I am right, but only because I'm biased. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
