In a message dated 9/9/06 11:48:36 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > Right, that's why ABC sent copies of the film to
> > right-wingers and refused to send it to lefties,
> > and is now fighting tooth and nail against liberal
> > critics of the film. And why CBS deferentially
> > obeyed its right-wing critics who objected to the
> > Reagan film and took it off the air. And why
> > Disney wouldn't distribute Michael Moore's film.
> > And why the media attacked Gore during the 2000
> > campaign using the lies the RNC sent them.
> >
> > If liberals tried to take over journalism and the
> > media, let's hope the evangelicals will be just
> > as successful.
> >
> > So Judy, let me ask you, where on the political spectrum do you
> place, in
> > general, the major media? ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, The largest news
> papers and
> > magazines like The NY Times, LA Times, Washington Post, Newsweek,
> Time etc. I take
> > it that you don't find them liberal but based upon your comments
> above
> > surely you don't find them conservative , do you? Based upon what
> you are saying ,
> > it almost sounds like you can't consider somebody a liberal
unless
> they are
> > an out and out Marxist.
>
> I'm not going to dignify that with a response.

P.S.: I will point out, however, that your nitwit
comment was made *in lieu of* addressing my examples
of right-wing mainstream media bias.

Ah, so I am right. In order for you to consider the media liberal they would actually have to be what most people consider far left wing. No, I don't think the media is far left wing but does have a general slant to the left that they try to keep subtle so as to not openly appear biased thus ruining their credablility. As for ABC's decisions about who got previews of the mini series and who didn't, I can't say, but one example of showing a little favoritism to one side, if in fact it happened,( some how the Clinton administration got previews or they wouldn't be complaining) ,doesn't correct decades of showing favoritism to the other. CBS I'm sure, made a business decision. They were about to offend an entire nation, one that had voted Ronald Reagan, America's most popular president by having No one other than Barbara Streisand's hubby play the main role among other conflicts of interest. CBS didn't want to risk it. As for Disney, who gives a crap what they put out or don't put out. For them it's business also. Your three examples can't begin to balance decades of abuse.
__._,_.___

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Reply via email to