--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you don't see dramatic distinctions between this > situation and the F9/11 one, I suspect you're either a > Republican shill, or bending ovr backwards to appear > fair simply because Judy (and to a lesser extent, I) > are expressing doubts about it.
I'm merely pointing out that some people (Judy more than you) tend to be total hypocrites with regard to the Republicans you hate. There seems to be *no question* that this miniseries was an intentional hatchet job. But Judy and others were advocating a form of censorship (try to keep the film from being seen) that was obviously based on their *own* (Democratic) poliitcal goals. Judy's original suggestion was that the film not be shown until after the upcoming mid-term elections. There can be NO conceivable reason for her making that suggestion unless what she was *really* wanting to achieve was to keep potential voters from seeing something that might make them less likely to vote Democratic. It was *purely* a suggestion that was based on censoring what the public could see, with the idea of influencing an upcoming election. There is no other *conceivable* reason for suggesting that delay of the broadcast date. And *then* she further stipulated that when the miniseries *was* finally shown, it should be shown on pay TV and not free broadcast TV. She can claim all day that this was to make it seem more "like entertainment," but I think that every thinking person in the FFL audience knows what she really had in mind. Fewer people watch pay TV than broadcast TV. Duh...Judy wanted the film *seen* by fewer people. I'm checking in on this tempest in a pisspot because ONCE AGAIN Judy has shown her willingness to do the *same* things herself that she decries in others. When it's *her* political goals that she wants advanced, she's willing to do the *same* things that she admon- ishes the Republicans for doing. As Shemp has pointed out often, her supposed "outrage" over lying and immorality doesn't seem to apply as strictly to Democrats as it does to Republicans. Shemp thinks this failing is because she's a Democrat; I think it's because she's a hypocrite, that's all. > BTW, yu never answered my question about what car your > neighbor's kids are using to learn to drive with in > the UK? I don't know and I don't care. > How old are your neighbor's kids, BTW? I don't know and I don't care. Approaching the minimum legal driving age, one would assume. Are you still trying to claim that people are too stupid to learn two different procedures at the same time? If so, I will graciously end the debate by admitting that I feel it is *completely* possible that YOU are too stupid to learn two different procedures at once. There. Debate over. :-) To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
