--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>  
> In a message dated 9/13/06 1:05:12 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> To  advocate a position in 
> > which one can not invoke or talk about a  deity, anyplace, is 
> > PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF and that is  censorship
> > of free speech.
> 
> It would be, yes, but of course  nobody has advocated
> such a thing.
> 
> "Anyplace" would also include federal property.

Oh, I see, OK.

 To advocate religious  speech 
> must be relegated to certain places  is censorship and a
> violation  of the 1st amendment because it is prohibiting
> the free exercise thereof, by being restrictive to certain
> places, everywhere but federal property.

Somehow you aren't getting it about the establishment
clause.  Certain kinds of religious speech, under
certain circumstances, violate the establishment
clause.  These are rights that are *in conflict* in
some cases.

As I said earlier, a solution that leans toward
fulfilling the right to free speech leans away
from fulfilling the right to freedom of religion,
and vice-versa.  There is no solution that fulfills
both completely in these cases.  One or the other
is going to be violated no matter what.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to