Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Educating Barry, Shemp, and MDixon

[MDixon6569]

In a message dated 9/13/06 2:54:48 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: "Anyplace" would also include federal property. To advocate religious speech > must be relegated to certain places is censorship and a violation of the > 1st amendment because it is prohibiting the free exercise thereof, by being > restrictive to certain places, everywhere but federal property. > ??? Wht part of "the government will not establish" do you not understand? The correct words are :Congress shall make no *law* respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the *free* exercise thereof; or abridging the *freedom of speech*, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. There never has been a law made by congress establishing a religion but we had free exercise thereof for almost 200 years. What changed that all the sudden one couldn't *freely exercise thereof *since 1960 on federal property, it was allowed before and still is in Congress and in other government business. __._,_.___ To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___