--- In [email protected], Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- shempmcgurk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" > > <jstein@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], > > "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], > > "authfriend" <jstein@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], > > "shempmcgurk" > > > <shempmcgurk@> > > > > > wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > > > Kinda like Clinton who pushed through the > > law that required > > > > > > defendents in civil sexual harrassment suits > > to answer > > > questions > > > > > > about previous sexual harrassment > > cases...which is the ONLY > > > > reason > > > > > > he was asked the question about Lewinski in > > the Paula Jones > > > > > > deposition (which is what he lied about). > > > > > > > > > > Well, no, not very much like Clinton. Can you > > > > > tell us why, Shemp? > > > > > > > > Well, you're right. > > > > > > > > Clinton had sex with an employee; Foley didn't. > > > > > > Nope, wrong answer. Try again. > > > > It may be YOUR wrong answer but it's still factual. > > > > > > > > > > > Another similarity: both Clinton and Foley > > had "phone" sex > > > > (well, > > > > > > in Foley's case it was instant messaging > > sex) > > > > > > > > > > > > Of course, the difference between Foley and > > Clinton is that > > > > Clinton > > > > > > actually had sex with the underling in > > question; Foley did > > not. > > > > > > > > > > Of course, there's a much more significant > > difference. > > > > > Can you tell us what it is, Shemp? > > > > > > > > You're right; Clinton lied about it; Foley > > didn't. > > > > > > Nope, wrong answer. Try again. > > > > > > > It may be YOUR wrong answer but it's still factual. > > Shemp, why are you avoiding stating that Foley was > pursuing a minor? Clinton's sex with Monica was > inappropriate, unethical, but legal because she was > not a minor. Foley's sexual emails to the page are > inappropriate, unethical AND illegal.
But that's the whole point of what I'm trying to bring up! Because the age of consent in DC is 16, had Foley had consentual sex with the 17-year-old minor instead of IM conversations he would have been in less trouble! Believe me, this is NOT a defense of Foley, who is a scumbag by any stretch. Both let their > small head do the thinking for them. Both were stupid > and too horny for their own good. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To subscribe, send a message to: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Or go to: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ > > and click 'Join This Group!' > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
