--- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip> [I wrote:] > > Not only did you state the law incorrectly, but there > > are vastly more differences than similarities. > > Yes, and they are all -- embarassingly -- in Foley's favour.
Um, no, to the contrary. Just for one thing, Clinton's affair with Lewinsky was not illegal; she was 22 years old at the time, a consenting adult (as has already been pointed out to you, twice now). Had Foley's pages been 22 years old, he would be in no legal trouble at all. And the law in question (the Violence Against Women Act of 1994), a provision of which the Republicans used to entrap Clinton into lying about his entirely legal affair with Lewinsky by making him testify about his past sexual behavior in an unrelated sexual harassment lawsuit, was strenuously opposed by Republicans when it was passed. The law that caught Foley, in contrast, was strongly supported by Republicans. Your error in stating the law's provision, incidentally, was that you claimed it required a defendant in a sexual harassment case to testify about past sexual harrassment cases the defendant had been involved in and thus compelled Clinton to testify about Lewinsky. That's obviously wrong just on its face, since Clinton had never been sued by Lewinsky. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
