> "sparaig" <sparaig/Lawson English> wrote: > > coldbluiceman wrote: > > > "sparaig" <spare egg/Lawson English> wrote: > > > Y'know, maybe I can't read the stilted > > > language of the Indian Courts properly, > > > or maybe I > > > simply can't understand your points > > >(or both), > > > > Namaste Sir Lawson, > > Then please allow to clarify, and give you the gest of the > > tired "Old Anoop Chandola Story", > > and the fabrications of truth > > contained in Swami Shantanand's book > > -'Om Sri Jyothirmath'. > > > > First of all: > > (1) Regarding the "will" of Sri BrahmanandJi. > > None of the civil lawsuits were framed > > around the vaildity of > > the "will". > > .."Thus, none of the civil suits in > > this dispute seems to have been > > framed in terms of contesting the > > legal bona fides of Brahmananda's > > will..." > > http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucgadkw/position/shank-jyot-ascii.html > <snip> > As I said, one of us is misreading what the court has said...
Namaste Sir Lawson Only you. is "mis-reading what the court said". It really does not matter to me at all! Because, soon Brahmachari Mahesh will die in exile in Holland, and Shantanand is already dead. And, all you will have is a story Anoop Chandola told you 35 years ago which will be as irrealvant then, as it is now. It is irrealvant as Professor Dana Sawyer pointed out to you-, "the war is over and Sri Swami Swaroopanand owns the title at Jyotirmath". in case you are interested this is what i said (which you will ignore..again. But *Blind Faith* allows that sort of thing).. .."The court ruled that Swami Shantinand could not in fact understand Sanskrit language. And, this is not a "secular" issue as you tried to point out. As, the sanskrit language was used outside of the "religious" connation you suggested so this issue was decided by the court. Apparent to the court Swami Shantinand lacked demonstrable skill of sanskrit language ruled as such. And, the Court upheld the assertions of the Bharata Dharma Mahamandala. However, by the *extensive current research* by Dana Sawyer Profeesor of Religion and Philoshpy at Maine College of Art and Vidyasankar Sundaresan at issue was- the fact Sri BrahmanandJi never clearly indicated his successor. This fact was based upon few issues and *Legal Facts*- a. *legal Fact* the publication of the "will", which surfaced weeks after Sri BrahmanandJi's passing. Inspite of Swami Shantand's claim-, > > Item #1). A fully executed will of > > Sri BrahmanandJi was deposited in > > Allhalabad on December 18, 1952. > > (1st paragraph page 2 of 'Om Sri Jyothirmath') b. Swami Shantanand was a poor choice because of the *Legal Fact* he could not comprehend sanskrit nor the Vedas. Inspite of Swami Shantand's claim-, > > He was completely qualified the hold the > > seat as he was literate in > > Sanskrit and the Vedas". > > (2nd paragraph page 2 of 'Om Sri Jyothirmath') c. At issue was the fact that Swami Shantanand was installed in Sri BrahmanandJi's gaddi by "Brahmachari Mahesh and few friends that thought the will could be credible". As, Dana Sawyer Profeesor of Religion and Philoshpy at Maine College of Art has pointed out. Inspite of Swami Shantand's claim-, > > Item #2). He was installed in Varansi > > in the presence of hundreds of > > scholars from all over the country > >(2nd paragraph page 3 of 'Om Sri Jyothirmath') d. At issue were the suspicious behavior and motivations of Brahmachari Mahesh at about the time of Sri BrahmanandJi's passing. .."In fact, the earliest doubts about the will left by Brahmananda Saraswati were linked to suspicion of the motives and actions of Mahesh Yogi (then called Mahesh Brahmachari)..." http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucgadkw/position/shank-jyot-ascii.html To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
