--- In [email protected], new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "geezerfreak" <geezerfreak@> > wrote: > > > > Written by a long time former personal secretary of MMY. (Rick, you > > know who it is.) > > And is there a reason you do not disclose the ID of the secretary? > This doesn't sound like a "opinion piece" a writer would cloak in > anonymity. > > > > >What incredible nonsense and the pinnacle of an infantile dependant > > relationship to life. The whole message here is that, "see, all these > > years were not a waste and did pay off as at least some of us have > > become divine beings after all and are now worthy of being worshiped'. > > > > On the other hand, the appeal for all the TM supplicants is that they > > can continue playing the role of dependant child a little longer after > > MMY kicks the bucket and feel protected by their newly coronated royal > > lineage, all the while totally reinforcing the projection that they > > are in fact separate individuals on a cosmic journey and that surely > > one day too they will also finally become 'worthy', but above all keep > > the game going at all cost, even if the cost is the last remnant of > > commonsense. > > > > The self-proclaimed 'royal rulers of the age of enlightenment' playing > > court to "His Majesty" Raja Nada Ramm ... it's insanity on a high > > scale and a display of the sense of separation in one of its more > > outrageous and ridiculous manifestations! > > > My first reation to "long time personal secretary" aka skin boy, is > "great, some inner cirlce insights." But I knew, a bit, observed, > and/or have come to know a number of the past skin boys via their > posts in various places. My take is that some have digested their > experience, integrated lessons learned, and moved on. Others appear to > still be digesting it. As the above guy, imo. > > If the TMO has some cult attributes, skin boys were the most shining > examples of the cult -- the creme de la cult. A necessary, though not > necessarily sufficient, qualification for skin boy was total surrender > to MMY, TMO, and all the nuttiness. They bought into it 100%. 200%. > Not the epitomy of highly stable, "self-actualized" -- in the more > psychological sense, deep thinkers. Thats my view -- in retrospect. So > why would i be intrigued to read what these guys think? What they saw > is one thing. But their opinions? Views? From an ex creme-of-the-cult? > > Those skin-boys who have digested and integrated the experience and > moved on, do provide some insights at times, IMO, but I always keep > with a handful of salt in my hand. others who are still struggling > with, digesting the experince, yet to fully integrate its lessons -- > their views provide less value to me. > All of which is your way of saying the Rajas and Kings trip looks ducky to you? The topic of the post was the over the top weirdness going on in Vlodrop these days.
You say you "know" these guys from their posts. Your armchair analysis of this particular guy's present mental state couldn't be more off-base. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
