new.morning <no_reply@> wrote:

"geezerfreak" <geezerfreak@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > Those skin-boys who have digested and integrated the experience and
> > moved on, do provide some insights at times, IMO, but I always keep
> > with a handful of salt in my hand. others who are still struggling
> > with, digesting the experince, yet to fully integrate its lessons --
> > their views provide less value to me.


> All of which is your way of saying the Rajas and Kings trip looks
> ducky to you? 


And why would you suggest that? I said nothing as to my views of the
raja thing. As we all do at times -- i am a great offender at times --
you are perhaps seeing something on the page that is not there. If not
on the page, where is it? In my experience, such things are in my
head, not on the page. It occurs when I read something with other than
a fresh view, and impose some pre-judgement on the poster as to their
views.

But since you aparently asked (implied an inquiry) my views, at a
minimum, I can see other /additonal possibilities for some rajas other
than:

* incredible nonsense 
* the pinnacle of an infantile dependant
* "see, all these years were not a waste and did pay off"
* some of us have become divine beings 
* we are now worthy of being worshiped'.

And I can see other /additonal possibilities for some meditators 
other than: 

* continue[ing] playing the role of dependant child a little longer
after MMY kicks the bucket
* feeling protected by their newly coronated royal lineage
* while totally reinforcing the projection that they are in fact
separate individuals on a cosmic journey
* [a view that] one day too they will also finally become 'worthy', 
keeping the game going at all cost, even if the cost is the last
remnant of  commonsense.
* it's insanity on a high scale and a display of the sense of
separation in one of its more
outrageous and ridiculous manifestations!
 

As far as being "ducky", I am no longer in the habit of a continually
judging everything I see as good/bad/ducky/sucky. More of the time, I
drop that clutter of the (monkey) mind, and just say "oh". Observation
observed. "Interesting". 

Unless I need to actually make a personal decisioon on something, why
jugge it as good or bad. And even If I judge it as "not ducky for me,
I decide this action or non-action", that does not imply or extend to
a view that it serves no value for some others.

> The topic of the post was the over the top weirdness
> going on in Vlodrop these days.
> 
> You say you "know" these guys from their posts. Your armchair analysis
> of this particular guy's present mental state couldn't be more off-base.
>

Since you have not disclosed who it is, I am not in a position to
specifically comment on this person's degree of digesting his skin-boy
experience. But judging by the above comment, he seems prone to
extremes, and ranting -- as some, not all, former skinboys are, IMO. A
sign, IMO, of undigested / unintegrated experiences

For example, "incredible nonsense and the pinnacle of an infantile
dependant relationship to life". This seems characteristic of an
obsession with, seeing things that are perhaps reflective of his
continuing struggle with his past demons -- al la "how could I have
been so duped". 







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to