--- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], off_world_beings > > > <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" > > > > <shempmcgurk@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" > > > > <shempmcgurk@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" > <jstein@> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], off_world_beings > > > > > > <no_reply@> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" > > > > <jstein@> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In > [email protected], "shempmcgurk" > > > > > > > > <shempmcgurk@> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > > > > If, as you say, the "WMDs were destroyed", then, > > > pray > > > > > tell, > > > > > > > > > > > why was Saddam not co-operating in letting > > > inspectors > > > > > in? > > > > > > > > > > > Pretty stupid on his part if he didn't have any > WMDs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He *did* let inspectors in. Bush has lied > repeatedly > > > > > > > > > > about that.>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Didn't the inspectors say again and again that there > > > > > > > > > was no evidence of WMD production? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yup. And the team we sent in *after* the invasion > > > > > > > > to look for the WMD that the inspectors supposedly > > > > > > > > missed said so too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All the more reason why Saddam was so stupid for not > letting > > > > the > > > > > > > inspectors go wherever they wanted to go while in Iraq. > > > > > > > > > > > > He did. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, like the boy who cried wolf once too many times. > > > > > > > > > > Tough luck for him for trying to push a superpower around.>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > And tough luck to the, AT LEAST, 400,000 innocent people that > died > > > > as a result of your disgusting satanic agenda. > > > > > > > > OffWorld > > > > > > > > > > Well, I've seen the figure of 50,000 and in the last couple of > days > > > 600,000. > > > > > > > > > 50,000 is directly due to Coalition action. The 600,000 is deaths > beyond what would be > > normal pre-invasion. > > > > Yeah, and when that figure came out it was considered high...indeed, > 10,000 was considered high... >
The current US casualty figures are: 2700ish dead, 20,000 wounded, about half of those with brain damage and/or amputations, maybe more. We have body armor and the best weapons and the most ammo and are doing most of the shooting. Are you seriously suggesting that the Iraqi dead and wounded are only 2x as high as ours, with NO collatoral damage, even though most fighting is in urbun areas? That's what the 50,000 figure implies... To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
