Marek, if you're champing at the bit to take a crack at critiquing Barry's posts, I'm certainly not going to stand in your way.
But there's not going to be any agreement between us. I'll just do what I do anyway--on those rare occasions when someone else takes Barry on and lambastes him to my satisfaction, I just stand aside and watch, murmuring "Bravo" from time to time. --- In [email protected], "Marek Reavis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Judy, don't say no. My promise is genuine. The fact that I don't > share your views is no reason to nix the experiment. I'll be > scrupulous and thorough even though I can't guarantee that I will find > the same faults and flaws as you would; but that's part of the > experiment, right? And we've got nothing to lose by at least trying. > No one will be hurt, no cause lost -- there won't be any bad > consequences at all. How can we not at least try? > > Please. Reconsider. It won't be that hard, I'm positive. Please > just think it over a little more. Sleep on it and let me know > tomorrow, okay? > > Marek > > ** > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "Marek Reavis" > > <reavismarek@> wrote: > > <snip> > > > Just a little bit more of tweaking and we have a deal. > > > > No, Marek, sorry, we're done. > > > > If you really can't see Curtis's dishonesty and > > unfairness--and you were even reading the most > > recent exchange between him and me, in which it > > was rampant--you certainly aren't going to be > > able to critique Barry's posts effectively. > > > > I thought it would be an interesting exercise for > > you to see what one is up against with Barry, > > given that you appeared to indicate an awareness > > of the problems with his posts. But since you've > > now clarified that that was all just metaphorical, > > there's no point. > > > > Thanks for the conversation. I wish you well. > > >
