On Nov 17, 2006, at 12:16 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 17, 2006, at 10:46 AM, sparaig wrote:
Neither simple nor complex.
And you keep claiming that shamatha is the same as TM. Here's what
an apparently
famous Shamatha advocate says about shamatha. He, at least, has the
excuse that he
never learned TM:
<gracious snip>
No that's NOT what I claim. I merely said TM is a *form* of Shamatha.
That's certainly not to imply that all forms of Shamatha are the same
as TM, they are not.
There are literally hundreds of different styles of Shamatha.
Well, so this guy's description of Shamatha certainly doesn't sound
like TM. Whose
description of Shamatha does?
If it sounded like it, it would be like it? Is that your reasoning?
I still think you could have a future as a TM standup comedian.
