--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > > > > > > On Nov 17, 2006, at 12:16 PM, sparaig wrote: > <snip> > > > Well, so this guy's description of Shamatha certainly doesn't > > > sound like TM. Whose description of Shamatha does? > > > > If it sounded like it, it would be like it? Is that > > your reasoning? > > That's, you know, kinda the minimum requirement. >
In my opinino, no description is adequate, but some are less adequate than others...
