--- In [email protected], "dhamiltony2k5" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So, after reading Thom Krysto's Weekly Reader article about how the > TMorg sanitizes things to their own benefit, who would you believe > more here about this PR science report? Dr. Pete's review on FFL or > Ken Chawkins of the MUM public relations department with this press > release of the MUM public relations department? >
Press releases, by their nature, are suspect. The best thing about this current situation is that, as far as I know, the numbers flying in the Dome are documented daily, the predictions have already been made, and people can independently monitor whatever they want and publish it online, as is being done right now anyway.
