--- In [email protected], kaladevi93 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], kaladevi93 <no_reply@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "nablusos108" <nablusos108@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Vaj is a fraud. > > > > > > > > He has no knowledge whatsoever about what he is writing. No > > knowledge > > > > of TM, the TM-Sidhis or the mechanics of structuring higher > > states of > > > > consciousness with Transcendental Meditation. > > > > > > > > Unfortunally for him, he is just a silly Budhist fundamentalist. > > > > > > > > His motivation is to demonalize TM and Maharishi whatever the > > costs to > > > > his evolution. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Having practiced under numerous yogis I find Vajs comments on real > > yoga "spot on" and > > > informed. But this is beyond what most TM people would be able to > > comprehend, > > > especially TB's like you find here on this site. > > > > > > Maharishi OTOH has to outsource TM-Sidhi people from India there > > are so few people who > > > even consider it worthwhile anymore, so draw your own conclusions. > > The truth of the > > > matter is we were simply not taught any of the detailed aspects of > > yoga in TM or in the > > > TMSP. > > > > > It is one thing to dive into spiritual knowledge deeply, learning > > all of the component parts and their relationship to one another. > > However it is misleading in my opinion to then trot out one's > > knowledge of same as to make another's path appear incomplete. > > > So you believe the Yoga sutras are different than TM and the TMSP??? > > That's a good one!
I don't know where that conclusion of yours comes from. > > Did you also think that Vaj practiced Patanjali's yoga? His posts seem to say that's not > what he practices, Yes, my full post which you have abbreviated above indicates that. He practices a different path for liberation than TM and TM Sidhis. so I don't think think you are listening very closely or very clearly to > what he's been saying. > Clarity is in the ear of the beholder... :-)
